S C M O
Advertise Your Product at SCMO
The Offshore Angler's Online Home ©
MarlinBlog

 

Welcome to the MarlinBlog - unvarnished, unedited and uncensored comments from your host on just about any topic you can imagine. Fishing, sports, celebrity, politics, religion - all those topics they tell you to stay away from in polite conversation. Not here, baby! I make you no promise but this - we may agree, we may disagree, but you'll always get the truth - as I see it ...



Home » Archives » June 2007 » Your Tax Dollars At Work

[Previous entry: "The Perils Of Petra"] [Next entry: "Your Tax Dollars At Work Part II"]


06/18/2007: "Your Tax Dollars At Work"

For whatever reason, our society has lost the ability to compromise. Somehow over the last 100 years or so, we've forgotten how to develop an answer to a problem that isn't either black or white - grey just doesn't exist anymore. It's just too hard - or too contentious - to develop policies that actually look at an individual case and judge it on it's merits, so we develop sweeping policies that deprive everyone equally. That's why we see zero tolerance policies where a 5-year-old is expelled from school for pulling a girl's hair, or a child's water-bottle is confiscated at the airport ... or women in NYC can prance around topless ...

A woman arrested for exposing her breasts has accepted a $29,000 settlement from the city, her lawyer said.

Jill Coccaro, 27, was arrested on a topless stroll two years ago, despite a 1992 state appeals court ruling that concluded women should have the same right as men to take off their shirts.

Her attorney, Jeffrey Rothman, told the Daily News that his client won the civil rights settlement from the city, which did not admit or deny wrongdoing.

"We hope the police learn a lesson and respect the rights of women to go topless," Rothman said.

She told the newspaper she had gone bare-breasted after running the 2004 city marathon without police bothering her.

"I've always just felt that was something natural," Feeley said of going topless. "I've kind of always done it out of practicality."

Feel free to insert your favorite statement about the decline of social mores here.

If we still understood the art of compromise, then we'd be able to apply some common sense here, and recognize that for as far back as written history exists, advanced societies have had their women cover their breasts. But we can't. Is it discriminatory to force a woman to cover herself? Sure. But is it reasonable? Sure. This is just one woman who can't handle the concept of compromise trying to impose her off-kilter values on the rest of us, while everyone else doesn't have the backbone to stand up and say, "Man ... is this dumb!"

As for me, I'm fine with topless women running around, so long as they understand I may never look them in the eyes again ... wink

Replies: 3 Comments


On Tuesday, June 19th, bring "them" on said:

on a closely-related subject,

best (and kindest) put-down of which I have heard when a man was NOT looking a statueskew woman IN THE EYE while talking to her:-

"It's O.K., they're both still there. I counted them this morning !"

Now is that class or what ?

big grin


On Tuesday, June 19th, MarlinNut said:

Boy ... all I ever get is "Hello? I'm up here ... " wink


On Tuesday, June 19th, goggle eyes said:

Ah - that's not half as nice. Still I suppose you can assume she's not trying to be nice to you if she doesn't want you to admire her bulbous bows instead of her bridge & tower !

and what a great name under those circumstances:- "Feeley"! LOL !


MarlinBlog Links

Home
Archives

Entries By Date

June 2007
SMTWTFS
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Search Archives


Best O' The Blogs

LA Observed
Wonkette
FishbowlLA
Gawker
Tabloid Baby
IDon'tLikeYouInThatWay
Channel Island
Defamer
Dilbert Blog
Dlisted
Blog Maverick



Bloggers' Rights at EFF


Support the MarlinBlog!!